Re: Towards a Formula for Primes


Douglas Eagleson wrote:

<snip>

A fraction as ratio was the c^2=a^2+b^2 equation and the next was the
question, how to
not just test, but count a list of primes.

So the test is commonly taken to the limit of conception and given an
algebratic ring representation. And then called a counting. I am not
a mathematician, but just warn of the level of trial you seek.

Step one is to stay geometric. Forsake mathematics. Always call the
number a point reference. A second class of reader is then required.
A geomtery expert.

This rambling collection of words pasted together isn't even English,
let
alone mathematics. It is a word salad; devoid of any information
content.

Can someone else make sense of the gibberish that was written? I
certainly
can't.

<snip>


Geometry is speed limited by the ratio factor solution for it has no
commutivity property.

Wubba wubba wubba ........ More word salad; grab words at random and
paste
them together.... The result has no meaning whatsoever.

.

Relevant Pages