Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- From: "charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx" <charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 May 2007 09:55:56 -0700
On 10 Mai, 02:08, Gerry Myerson <g...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Then maybe one should read something about the two topics.
Knuth's Art of Computer Programming has a nice section on
pseudo-randomness. Niven has written a couple of good books
on irrationality.
Clearly, you are not very rigorous.
I will repeat an earlier story.
A person whose blushes I wish to spare wrote a book in which he put a
"general formula for primes", and the Japanese decided that this was a
sensation. Alan Coutanceau-Clark tested the "formula" for the eighth,
and it failed.
AT THAT TIME, I was reading "The Art of Computer Programming" by
Professor Donald E Knuth, which had another "formula" that failed at
the eighth.
Don't bicker with me.
I have already read up on the subject. How else would I have known
about that formula, if I had not entered the pages?
Before you accuse, you should check what was written. I already said I
had read it.
Charles Douglas Wehner
.
- References:
- Towards a Formula for Primes
- From: charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- From: Douglas Eagleson
- Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- From: Pubkeybreaker
- Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- From: Douglas Eagleson
- Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- From: charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Towards a Formula for Primes
- Prev by Date: Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- Next by Date: Re: Taylor Series
- Previous by thread: Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- Next by thread: Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|