Re: Set Perspective Transformation.
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 19:03:00 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 10 May 2007 13:02:26 EDT, Kyle Milliken wrote:
But what if it was right, and A was not so A that it is A
Okay, i don't care if they are differnt any more, they are not.. P is exactly the same as R.
All i want is for P to exist AND R to exist, i don't care if it's a duplicate, thats fine for now.
I have two sets, R and P which are identical, but i don't want to follow through with the next part and simply remove P because it's identical, i want P to continue to exist.
Imagine that there are two unbridgeable universes A and B which each contain within them the set of real numbers. Any operation i preform must take place in one of the two universes and it's results will be within that universes as well. Even though all of my operations are done in say universe A, universe B still exists with "the" set of real numbers in it. None of my operations i do in A happen within B.
When you add 2+2 and get 4, the 2 does not cease to exist. It's still there,
and still equal to 2. So it is with sets.
--
Dave Seaman
Oral Arguments in Mumia Abu-Jamal Case to be heard May 17
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
<http://www.abu-jamal-news.com/>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Set Perspective Transformation.
- From: Kyle Milliken
- Re: Set Perspective Transformation.
- References:
- Re: Set Perspective Transformation.
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: Set Perspective Transformation.
- From: Kyle Milliken
- Re: Set Perspective Transformation.
- Prev by Date: Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Set Perspective Transformation.
- Next by thread: Re: Set Perspective Transformation.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|