Re: Why Quantum Computing Is Bunk

On 12 May 2007 18:16:10 -0700, Vend
<vend82@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 13 Mag, 00:41, Traveler <trave...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Paul Feyerabend, the foremost science critic of
the last century, once
wrote in his book 'Against Method' that "the most
stupid procedures
and the most laughable results in their domain are
surrounded with an
aura of excellence. It is time to cut them down in
size, and to give
them a more modest position in society."
Feyerabend was speaking of
scientists in general but he may as well have been
talking about the
new "science" of quantum computing. Quantum
computing is based on the
idea that the states of certain quantum
properties, such as the spin
of a particle, are superposed, meaning that a
quantum property can
have multiple states simultaneously.

You can read the rest of the article
here:http://rebelscience.blogspot.com/

ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Back to trolling?

Same to you, NIST con man. ahahaha...

Can you tell me how you calculate the diffraction
pattern in a
diffraction experiment with single photons or single
electrons using
your bible physics (or whatever you like)?

Can you tell me why particle decay is probabilistic?
On second
thought, forget it. We both know you QC hoaxers don't
have a clue.
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Physics From the Bible!
Shaking the Foundations of Physics:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Seraphim/Physics.htm


Particle decay is not probabilistic. Particle decay
is certain. The calculation of the length of time
in which any particle will decay is a statistical
measure. The foundation is statistical mechanics,
a quite well known empirically validated method
going back to the middle of the nineteenth century.
You need to hit the books and garner a few facts,
none of which, I'm afraid, will be found in the bible.

Tom
.