Re: Cantor Confusion

On 14 Mai, 22:09, William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 14, 3:17 pm, WM <mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Which of the following statements is not true

Every element of R is different from p.

Every node of p is in some element of R

Back to the facts:

1) No element r =/= p of R is required to cover any node of p. (I can
show of every such element r =/= p which you may name that it is not
required.)
2) No element of R is sufficient to cove all nodes of p.
Hence your set R is not suitable to demonstrate your claims.

Regards, WM


.