Re: Ramification Schema.
- From: zuhair <zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 May 2007 08:03:02 -0700
On May 23, 9:07 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 24, 10:25 am, zuhair <zaljo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 23, 10:38 am, zuhair <zaljo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not only differential pairing and infinity can be proved in this
theory, actually even Union can be proved, so actually one should drop
union from the list of axioms of this theory.
5) Ramification schema: if F is a formula in which x is not free then
all closures of
AyEu(Az(F(y,z)->zeu)) ->
AmEx(mex & Ay(yex -> Az(F(y,z)->zex))).
are axioms.
Now Let u=y
What makes you think that is allowed?
allowed.From first order logic with identity we know for sure that this is
Proof:
Ay(Az(F(y,z)->zey)) -> AyEu(Az(F(y,z)->zeu))
Since AyEu(Az(F(y,z)->zeu)) -> AmEx(mex & Ay(yex -> Az(F(y,z)->zex))).
Then:Ay(Az(F(y,z)->zey))->
AmEx(mex & Ay(yex -> Az(F(y,z)->zex))).
Since from FOL we know that for formulas F P Q
(F->P->Q) -> (F->Q)
Zuhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ramification Schema.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Ramification Schema.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Ramification Schema.
- References:
- Re: Ramification Schema.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Ramification Schema.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Ramification Schema.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Ramification Schema.
- Prev by Date: Re: x^2 - Ay^2 =1
- Next by Date: Re: Bassam's hidden meaning
- Previous by thread: Re: Ramification Schema.
- Next by thread: Re: Ramification Schema.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|