Re: A simple error
- From: "harry" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 13:27:39 -0500
<jstevh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1180273542.138560.72200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Posters in attacking my proofs showing inconsistency with the ring of
algebraic integers routinely move outside the ring. Here is a
YET ANOTHER WRONG
post meant to show you how they do it.
<snip crap>
This result is one of the biggest in mathematical history
demonstrating an actual inconsistency with a well-known mathematical
object, which mathematicians have unknowingly used for over a hundred
years without understanding how it can lead to false arguments that
appear to be proofs when they are not.
SQUARE ROOT OF 4 ? -2 or + 2 ?
Readers should note that I have multiple mathematical discoveries at
this time where all have been vigorously attacked by posters who
clearly have a need to deny any mathematical result if they feel it
will give credence to my research.
YOUR RESEARCH GETS AN "F", YOU FAILED.
They are dogmatic in their resistance,
BECAUSE YOU ARE ALWAYS WRONG.
<snip rest of same old crap>
James Harris
.
- References:
- JSH: A simple error
- From: jstevh
- JSH: A simple error
- Prev by Date: maximum number of spheres in a volume
- Next by Date: Re: Map coloring
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: A simple error
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: A simple error
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|