Re: Extended real line question
- From: José Carlos Santos <jcsantos@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 22:22:59 +0100
On 28-05-2007 21:22, mathman wrote:
Consider the extended real line [-\infty;+\infty] (where "\infty" is the term used to denote "infinity"). It can be naturally equipped with the order topology.Every neighborhood of +oo contains some interval of
I would like to know how to show that this extended real line is the closure of the (classical) real line.
the form
(x,+oo] and therefore it contains real numbers. So
+oo belongs
to the closure of real line.
The real line without oo or -oo is a closed set,
*Every* topological space is a closed subset of itself.
so those "numbers" aren't in the closure under ordinary
topology (generated from open intervals).
No? Then where is the fault in my proof?
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos
.
- References:
- Re: Extended real line question
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: Extended real line question
- From: mathman
- Re: Extended real line question
- Prev by Date: Re: x^2 - Ay^2 =1
- Next by Date: Call for papers
- Previous by thread: Re: Extended real line question
- Next by thread: Differential equation with no solution
- Index(es):