Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:57:27 -0400
"T.H. Ray" <thray123@xxxxxxx> writes:
Yes, we know (by the Continuum Hypothesis, Cantor) that
betweeness is infinite--not just "huge." Suppose
we reject the CH? Every sequence is then finite
and differs from another sequence that infinitely
approaches, but does not reach it, by an infinitesimal
margin. (This is the insight, of course, that led
to the development of analysis--the study of continuous
functions.)
Sorry, but I have no idea what you are trying to express here. How is
the Continuum Hypothesis relevant here?
--
"But remember, as long as one human being follows the rules of
mathematics, then mathematics as a human discipline survives.
Right now I'm that one human being, so mathematics survives."
-- James S. Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- From: T.H. Ray
- Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- References:
- Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- From: chajadan
- Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- From: T.H. Ray
- Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- Prev by Date: Re: Levi-Civita Symbol
- Next by Date: Re: JHS: Inversion Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- Next by thread: Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|