Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- From: bassam king karzeddin <bassam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:37:32 EDT
"bassam king karzeddin" <bassam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrotein
messagenews:22019165.1180601903492.JavaMail.jakarta@nitrogen.
mathforum.org...unique
Re: What is wrong between decimal and fraction?Reply
Posted: May 28, 2007 6:01 PM Plain Text
Dear All
Mr King.
[...]
Any positive real number (except one) is a
production of primenumbers
numbers with each prime raised to a non-zerointeger and therefore of
unique decimal representation
Factorisation is good.
Hence, the irrational numbers are all those
that have endless
decimal digital expansion in any number system,provided that their
terminating digits are not all zero
Why?
From the early definition of the rational numbers, we
can simply extend their concept, but with infinite
integers, so the real number definition becomes as a
ratio of two finite or infinite coprime integers
And this definition doesn't count (zero, one,
infinity) as real numbers except by CONVENTION
From this you can see now why (0.999...) is anirrational number even we
don't know its prime factorization and thereforcan't be equal to one
[...]
I'm not sure what this is, but it's not a sound
nd proof.
In my opinion, the proof is straight foreword from
the definition only
Regards
--
Glen
B.Karzeddin
The proof
First-Consider a number (N) with finite number of digits say (M), of string (999...), this of course can be factored into prime numbers only
Second-Now add one to the previous number (N), (999..+1), you will get another number (N+1) with COMPLETELY deferent prime factorization
Third repeat the process for (M+1) digits, and this is the principle of Induction method of the proof, where you would find that always applicable, then
You will always get two sets of prime factorization for (N), and (N+1), where can never be considered exactly equal, there fore their division (N/(N+1)) can not be equal to one except by consideration or limit or convention
Is not this is a rigorous proof for such a SILLY problem?
B.Karzeddin
Al Hussein bin Talal University
JORDAN
.
- References:
- Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- From: bassam king karzeddin
- Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- Prev by Date: Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- Next by Date: Re: VECTOR SPACE
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- Next by thread: Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|