Re: Levi-Civita Symbol
- From: Igor <thoovler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 10:09:35 -0700
On May 31, 1:04 pm, s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 31 May, 17:51, Igor <thoov...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 31, 9:56 am, "Christopher J. Henrich" <chenr...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <wood-3105070643290...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, J. B. Wood
<w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello, all. My question: Is the subject symbol a tensor or not? Several
presumably authoritative references I have on tensor analysis seem to
disagree on this. Sincerely,
The thingamajig with three indices? Based on combining first
derivatives of the metric tensor? It definitely is not a tensor,
though it does arise in the theory of "tensor analysis."
One of the many good books on the subject is /Tensor/ /Analysis/, by
Synge and Schild. It's reprinted by Dover publications.
--
Chris Henrichhttp://www.mathinteract.com
The total lack of evidence is the surest sign that the conspiracy is working.
It sounds like you're confusing it with the Christoffel symbols,
otherwise known as affine connections.
Hmm... I was under the impression that the Levi-Civita symbol was just
the Christoffel symbol associated to the unique torsion-free metric-
compatible connection. Perhaps usage differs.
-Rotwang
I think part of the confusion is that, in some contexts, the
Christoffel is referred to as Levi-Civita. Check this out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levi-Civita_symbol
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Levi-Civita Symbol
- From: sg552
- Re: Levi-Civita Symbol
- References:
- Levi-Civita Symbol
- From: J. B. Wood
- Re: Levi-Civita Symbol
- From: Christopher J. Henrich
- Re: Levi-Civita Symbol
- From: Igor
- Re: Levi-Civita Symbol
- From: sg552
- Levi-Civita Symbol
- Prev by Date: Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- Next by Date: Re: Proof 0.999... is not equal to one.
- Previous by thread: Re: Levi-Civita Symbol
- Next by thread: Re: Levi-Civita Symbol
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|