Re: maximization problem--lagrange
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:50:38 -0600
In article <1180923942.875675.321960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"C6L1V@xxxxxxx" <C6L1V@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 3, 5:01 pm, chri...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Using lagrange's method, I want to find the maximum value of
f(x1, ..., xn) = | sum_(k=1)^n a_k*x_k |
subject to the constraint g(x1,...,xn) = sum_(k=1)^n x_k^2 = 1
I know I need to take the gradient of f and g and suppose they are
scalar multiples.
It was suggested to maximize the square of f to get rid of the
absolute value. Doing this I get the kth equation from grad(f) =
\lambda*grad(g) as follows:
2( sum_(k=1)^n a_k*x_k = 2\lambda*x_k
2a_k^2*x_1 + ... + 2(a_k^2 - \lambda)*x_k + ... + 2a_k^2*x_n = 0
(k=1 to n)
Is there an easy way to solve this system?
Denote the inner product of two vectors u and v as <u,v>. The problem
is max <a,x>^2, subject to <x,x>=1. The Lagrange equations read as
2*<a,x>*a_i = 2*lambda*x_i for i = 1,2,...,n; that is, <a,x>*a =
lambda*x .....(1).
Once you translate it into vector terms, it is clear without needing
calculus that the maximum of the inner product between a and x, occurs
when the angle between a, as a constant vector, and x, as a vector of
constant length, is zero.
So one solution is at x = a/|a|, and the maximum is |a|.
Because of the absolute value on the expression to be maximized, there
is a second, equal, maximum at x = -a/|a|.
.
- References:
- maximization problem--lagrange
- From: chrizm7
- maximization problem--lagrange
- Prev by Date: Re: Proofs.
- Next by Date: Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- Previous by thread: maximization problem--lagrange
- Next by thread: Need Advice - - just passed PreCalculus with an A+, now moving on to Calculus w/ Applications
- Index(es):