Re: * says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0

From: Franziska Neugebauer <Franziska-Neugebauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:08:13 +0200

G. Frege wrote:

On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:56:14 -0700, WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

[...]

F.

One question:

"Wolfgang Mückenheim is a classic crank. Why do you
imagine, as you seem to do, that there is any point
arguing with him?"

(Torkel Franzen, sci.math)

F. N.
--
xyz
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: * says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: WM

References:
- *** T. Winter says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: WM
- Re: *** T. Winter says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: *** T. Winter says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: WM
- Re: *** T. Winter says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: *** T. Winter says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: WM
- Re: *** T. Winter says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: G . Frege

Prev by Date: Re: *** T. Winter says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
Next by Date: Re: *** T. Winter says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
Previous by thread: Re: *** T. Winter says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
Next by thread: Re: * says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread