Re: 3 dimensional numbers !

From: tommy1729 <tommy1729@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:29:06 EDT

In article
<15414114.1181170749303.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
forum.org>,
tommy1729 <tommy1729@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

.... a condition for a number for me is to be

commutativ associativ

distributiv ....

O.K. Below is a consequence of the associative
iative law for
multiplication.

NOT TRUE assosiativ numbers are not always distributiv !

why do you think they have 3 words for them is 1 is sufficient ???????

here is def:

i*i=-1
i*j=i
2*j=2j
j*j=1
....

Therefore -j = (ii)j = i(ij) = ii = -1,

so j = 1.

Ken Pledger.

hmmm yes i see the problem.
.

References:
- Re: 3 dimensional numbers !
  - From: Ken Pledger

Prev by Date: Re: Proof of Dirichlet's Test for convergence of given integral
Next by Date: Re: i need solutions mannual of this book
Previous by thread: Re: 3 dimensional numbers !
Next by thread: Re: 3 dimensional numbers !
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread