Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien <abbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 03:54:09 -0400
Dave Seaman wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:54:50 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
I guess one could argue that even if we do have Cauchy sequences in which
some of the representations have irrational elements, they must all have
representations which are purely rational due to the fact that the real
numbers were completely defined by the latter. That is, of course,
assuming that such a construction actually took place.
Yes, a sequence of reals has a representation as a sequence of sequences
of rationals.
Is such a sequence of sequences of rational numbers a real number?
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Glen Wheeler
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- References:
- Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: sg552
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- From: Dave Seaman
- Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- Prev by Date: Ackermann like set theory
- Next by Date: Re: Online Geometric Treatment of Lagrange Multipliers?
- Previous by thread: Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- Next by thread: Re: Dedekind Cuts, Fundamental Sequences: why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading