Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: LauLuna <laureanoluna@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 04:43:32 -0700
On Jun 15, 6:04 pm, zuhair <zaljo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cantor's proof is that: for any injective function f from w to P(w)
there will always exist a subset of w that is not in the range of > f,
and this subset is defined using separation as {x|xew & ~xef(x)}
The formula ~xef(x) is not a formula in ONE free variable!
It can easily be rendered such by Existential Elimination in the
course of the proof of Cantor's theorem; this does not prevent from
proving Cantor's theorem in Z.
So, definability plus your restricted separation would yield
inconsistency.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- References:
- Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Separation,Power and Countability.
- Prev by Date: Re: Hypergeometric Probability
- Next by Date: Re: Solutions Manual print, on Cd and by email to low price
- Previous by thread: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Next by thread: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading