Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 08:41:03 -0700
On Jun 17, 7:41 am, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 17, 6:47 am, LauLuna <laureanol...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eliminate the variable f by
giving it a constant name,
Maybe that's justified in your logic; but it's not justified in mine.
I was wrong; you're right, LauLuna. We can make that move to a
constant symbol (I'm so used to using variables that I forgot, e.g.,
Enderton's version of rule EI). zuhair's revised separation schema
does not block Cantor's argument.
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- References:
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Prev by Date: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Next by Date: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Previous by thread: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Next by thread: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Index(es):
Loading