Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- From: Randy Poe <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:09:58 -0700
On Jun 14, 6:32 pm, Andre <andre.robe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A few weeks ago, I gave my 15 year old son a book on mathematical
puzzles that included a description of the 4 color theorem. After
spending some time drawing colored maps, he made a connection with
another problem, that of the impossibility of connecting 3 houses with
3 different utilities (gas, water, electricity) without having two
lines crossing.
Graph theory is a fascinating subject, one that I wish I had
more time to explore. There are plenty of unsolved conjectures
in graph theory.
You've got plenty of comments on 4CT (the Four Color Theorem). I'll
comment on your second point, about the houses and utilities.
Formally, the impossibility of solving that problem is this theorem:
"K3,3 is nonplanar". K3,3 is the graph that consists of two sets
of 3 nodes, with every node in the first set connected to every
node in the second set. It is nonplanar, meaning there is no
way to draw it in the plane without lines crossing.
A similar theorem: K5 is nonplanar. K5 is the fully-connected
graph of five nodes, with every node connected to every
other node.
Some more interesting related theorems:
K5-e and K3,3-e are planar for any e. (Take out any single
line and the remaining graph can be drawn in the plane).
A graph is planar if and only if it doesn't contain either
K5 or K3,3.
5CT: Every planar graph is 5-colorable. The proof of this
is much simpler than the proof of 4CT (it was first
accomplished in 1890) and may give you and your son some
insights into elegant graph-theory arguments.
- Randy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: series involving reciprocal prime numbers
- Next by Date: Re: riemann hypothesis needed to factor numbers?
- Previous by thread: Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- Next by thread: Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|