Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- From: bill <b92057@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:54:53 -0700
On Jun 14, 11:08 pm, Proginoskes <CCHeck...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 14, 7:10 pm, bill <b92...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 14, 4:10 pm, Gerry Myerson <g...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <f4sg45$30n...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
rich...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin) wrote:
In article <1181860364.688539.71...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Andre <andre.robe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here's the "proof"; I suspect that the problem is right with the first
step.
Even though there's a problem, it's still a good try. (Not all good
ideas pan out.)
1. If there is a map where 5 colors are needed, it must be because 5
different countries are touching each other.
You're right. You need to prove this. How can you be sure there
aren't other configurations that somehow force 5 colours?
And maybe the easiest way to see that the reasoning is fallacious
is to draw yourself a map that needs 4 colors even though there
are no 4 different countries each bordering the other 3.
The easiest example I can think of is a map of the USA; look at Nevada
and the states surrounding it.
Just because the sqrt of 2 is rational is no reason to think that
the sqrt of 5 is also rational.
I think Bill meant to say "irrational"
No, I meant sqrt 4!
--- if not, then HE is
irrational 8-) --- but the idea of "A map that requires K colors needs
to have K regions all adjacent to each other" is easily seen to be
false for K = 3 and 4, so it could easily be false for K = 5.
In any case, the burden is on the prover to establish something which
is not immediately, obviously true.
--- Christopher Heckman
.
- References:
- Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- From: Andre
- Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- From: bill
- Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- From: Proginoskes
- Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- Prev by Date: Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- Next by Date: Re: Question about a^2+b^2=4k+1 prime ...
- Previous by thread: Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- Next by thread: Re: Four color theorem: why this is not a proof and pointer to simple explanations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|