Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- From: Said Alyami <said_yam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:20:54 -0700
I really wonder how you can pass by a problem then you just ASSUME it
to be " Not A Problem" , if we go this way, then even 1+1=5 can be
seen as NOT A PROBLEM !!
the problem again and briefly, to make sure you do not get lost in
details:
The real number line is one entity, you cannot define "a point" to be
the basic block and the least existence on the line, then in another
case "movement case", you just deny the existence of unique and
independent points "you accept only infinite stream of points as the
least accepted existence".
Real numbers line has to have ONLY ONE basic block, one least
existence "which is a point" at all cases,,,, real numbers lilne must
keep all his properties regardless of what happen over it or how you
look at it.,, you cannot approve a property in one case then deny it
in another case.
Said Alyami
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- From: hagman
- Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- From: tommy1729
- Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- From: Said Alyami
- Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- From: hagman
- Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- From: Said Alyami
- Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- From: Said Alyami
- Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- From: hagman
- Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- Prev by Date: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Next by Date: Derivatives of the natural log function
- Previous by thread: Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- Next by thread: Re: End-Point Paradox ( Infinity Paradoxes rise again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|