Why isn't James Harris working oh halting problem?
- From: Richard Henry <pomerado@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:24:06 -0700
On Jun 18, 4:41 pm, tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A halts if B halts
determining if A halts
depends on the halting of B
and B on C
and C on D etc
thats the basic idea of the halting problem and its socalled unsolvability.
however the idea is WRONG !
1) there is no known algoritm A for wich an algoritm B C AND D EXISTS !!!!
(in the sence that B C AND D are very different from A AND EACHOTHER and thus not A repeated n times in m steps )
2) the proof of the unsolvability is clearly a selfreference rather than a proof.
3) mathematical proof rather occur like proving that two opposite things dont add up, rather than saying this is true if that is true and that is true if this is true ...
4) iterations cannot be discribed bye totally different iterations
iteration A can not depend on iteration B unless there equal (see 1) ) if the iteration cannot be rewritten in a simpler "closed form"
more promising is
A halts if B does not.
B can then not be tested bye trial , but bye THEORY.
the idea of taking proofs to tested iterations is childish and primitive
IN GENERAL NO GREAT MATHEMATICIAN OR PROOF HAS EVER BEEN DONE LIKE THAT. (with a few exceptions but these never had an A B AND C AND D , just an A or an A and B nothing more)
another controversial topic
but i dare you to disproof 1) for any conjecture that is (not) decidable and no closed form functions used.
James will get the answer before you do.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why isn't James Harris working oh halting problem?
- From: tommy1729
- Re: Why isn't James Harris working oh halting problem?
- References:
- HALTING PROBLEM
- From: tommy1729
- HALTING PROBLEM
- Prev by Date: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Next by Date: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Previous by thread: Re: HALTING PROBLEM
- Next by thread: Re: Why isn't James Harris working oh halting problem?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|