Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:29:47 -0700
On Jun 20, 7:22 pm, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oops, I meant:
f(0) = least member of d
f(n+) = least member of d\f"(n+)
Then maybe f(L) = the least member of d\U{f"n | neL} ?
But that makes no use of the fact that we're specifically working with
Pw, so it wouldn't seem to be right.
MoeBlee
.
- References:
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Prev by Date: Why isn't James Harris working oh halting problem?
- Next by Date: Re: Graduate studies in Mathematics
- Previous by thread: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Next by thread: Re: Separation,Power and Countability.
- Index(es):