Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0

On 22 Jun., 15:41, Franziska Neugebauer <Franziska-
Neugeba...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

2. You will find an explanation of their function lim*, for which lim c
lim* holds,

So 0 c oo? Do you think so because I write two circles to express
infinity? Notice, they are by far smaller than 0.

in depth in my posting named "sum{i in N} i = 0"

Why did you deny recently that
lim[n in N] 1/2^n = 5
is possible while, of course,
lim*[n in N] 1/2^n = 1?

Why did you not discuss that, according to your orthodox mathematics?

sqrt(2) = 1 (in N) while
sqrt*(2) = 1,4 (in 10*N) and
sqrt**(2) = 1.41... (in R)?

Regards, WM

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
    ... c lim* holds, ... Do you think so because I write two circles to express ... is not defined by the standard limit definition and hence a value can be ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
    ... lim* holds, ... Do you think so because I write two circles to express ... Why did you not discuss that, according to your orthodox mathematics? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability
    ... But etymology can add, perhaps, a bit to being convincing, I thought. ... You claim that this equals N, ... lim sin ... You are the one running in circles. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Generalization of Bruns Constant
    ... Does lim n-->oo Bexist? ... does it have a sup? ... how fast does B_n go to infinity? ... for small primes 2 is the most common gap. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Sequence & arithmetic mean limit proof?
    ... I think I should get the top approaches infinity quite a bit faster than the bottom does, ... Since lim s_n = +, there is a point at which all remaining ... the partial sums of the series and the partial averages must have a ... lower bound, that they must eventually exceed zero, and that the ...
    (sci.math)