Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:45:21 -0700
On 23 Jun., 13:13, Franziska Neugebauer <Franziska-
Neugeba...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
WM wrote:
We orthodox mathematicians [...]
Who?
Not those which you erroneously consider to be. But there are more of
us than you might expect.
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- References:
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- Prev by Date: Re: little question
- Next by Date: Re: little question
- Previous by thread: Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- Next by thread: Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- Index(es):