Re: begining
- From: "Carsten Konig" <CarstenBKoenig@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:38:39 +0200
"Ioannis" <morpheus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:1183051602.860975@xxxxxxxxxxx
Carsten König wrote:
[snip]
And one other remark: if there was a "big bang" creating our spacetime
than the statement "X existed before Big Bang" is allways false
because
without spacetime the you can't apply "exist" to anything (X).
I think that also depends on how you interpret the word "exists".
The mathematical statement: "The number 1 exists" (as a solution, say, to the
equation x-1=0), asserts nothing about the "physical" existence of the number
one. In fact, the number one itself, is nowhere to be found, physically.
It only exists in the mathematical realm.
Yes - of course you are right and the problem is that I quoted "exist" when I
should have pointed to the "before" ... sorry (I guess I was still thinking about
the "sonic trees" ;) )
.
- References:
- begining
- From: Trek
- Re: begining
- From: robert
- Re: begining
- From: Carsten König
- Re: begining
- From: Ioannis
- begining
- Prev by Date: Re: a DTMC problem
- Next by Date: Re: begining
- Previous by thread: Re: begining
- Next by thread: Re: begining
- Index(es):