Re: Thinking about metric spaces
- From: Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:44:00 GMT
In article
<6441796.1183148156554.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
tommy1729 <tommy1729@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<1182926935.206647.132790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
,bit188 <mariana@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Another question: what other kinds of metrics arethere?
Take any convex set in R^2 (or R^n), symmetric with
respect to
the origin, and declare that for all points on the
boundary of that set
the distance to the origin is 1. Then to find the
distance between
any two points move a copy of your convex set so its
center is at
one of the points & see how much you have to scale
the set so
the other point is on the boundary - take the scaling
factor to be
the distance. That gives you a metric.
Think about it and you'll see that the usual metric,
the taxicab
metric, in fact all the L^p metrics, are special
cases of the metric
described here.
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for
email)
are you very hiddenly implying that you can rotate this metric afterall ?
or is it just my imagination ?
I don't know what it means to rotate a metric.
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thinking about metric spaces
- From: tommy1729
- Re: Thinking about metric spaces
- References:
- Re: Thinking about metric spaces
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Thinking about metric spaces
- From: tommy1729
- Re: Thinking about metric spaces
- Prev by Date: Re: rubiks cube
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: Why I am distancing
- Previous by thread: Re: Thinking about metric spaces
- Next by thread: Re: Thinking about metric spaces
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|