Re: PARADISE LOST: Debunking Cantor's theory

In article <4689ab6e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Franziska Neugebauer wrote:
WM wrote:

On 2 Jul., 15:34, Franziska Neugebauer <Franziska-
Neugeba...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
WM wrote:
On 2 Jul., 08:35, Subluxian <cbr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And it is equivalent to the definition I gave up thread
(somewhere): given a node n, it is the set of all paths containing
that node. We agree: that is what a "path-bunch" is.
That is the definition of a finite path bunch.
What does the "finite" in "finite path bunch" refer to?
It allows us to distinguish it from an infinite path bunch.

I have asked what "finite" in "finite path bunch" refers to? What entity
is considered "finite"?

F. N.

I think it refers to the position of the least common node,

Don't you mean "last" common node? The least common node, at least in
level order, would be the root.




Tony
.