Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0

From: WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:31:30 -0700

On 9 Jul., 00:05, Virgil <vir...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

***'s premise was not that SUM(N) cannot be defined in R

Whether it was his premise or not: SUM(N) cannot be defined in R, at
least in mathematics. In some of your crazy axiom systems, this may be
different.

Regards, WM

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: Virgil

References:
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: *** T. Winter
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: *** T. Winter
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
  - From: Virgil

Prev by Date: Re: Tough Financial Problem
Next by Date: Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
Previous by thread: Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
Next by thread: Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread