Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:56:08 -0600
In article <1183966811.531968.18330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You should try to study a bit of mathematics.
"...But, good my brother
Do not, as some ungracious pastors do,
Show me the steep and thorny way to heaven,
Whiles, like a puff'd and reckless libertine,
Himself the primrose path of dalliance treads
And recks not his own rede."
Then according to WM, every derivative must always equal 1 at all
points, and f(x) = |x| must have a derivative at x = 0, and lots more.
That's nonsense.
Maybe, but it is WM's nonsense, not mine, to argue that functions must
continuous at points outside their domains.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- Prev by Date: Re: History of Calculus
- Next by Date: inverse random subset problem
- Previous by thread: Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- Next by thread: Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- Index(es):