Re: CONWAY VS CANTOR

On Jul 9, 5:51 pm, tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9 jul, 07:13, Proginoskes <CCHeck...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Jul 4, 7:06 am, tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

from another topic :

On Jul 3, 8:04 am, Eckard Blumschein
<blumsch...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 7/3/2007 2:18 PM, hagman wrote:

On 3 Jul., 13:52, Eckard Blumschein
<blumsch...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Because I consider cardinality an
inappropriate distinction between
countable and uncountable I did not quote
aleph + a = aleph.

Which would be correct for finite
cardinalities (i.e. natural numbers) a.
For some fun look up the distinction
between
omega + a and a + omega.

I do not have fun with transfinite cardinals.
I consider them stupid
while cardinal Franzelin perhaps understood
more than Bourbaki.

You might like Conway's Surreal Numbers though,
where omega + a = a +
omega.

yes very much !!!
and john conway disproves cantor with his surreal
numbers !!!!
so i guess you need to choose
whos mathematican and who's crankpot
john conway vs cantor ?

And Tommy1729 wrote in the thread "A question for
Tommy 1729":

you claimed a paradox bye saying
(4)-(4) = () = 4-4 = 0 =(0)
but that is not a true paradox since the first
substracting is set
difference and the second is an aritmetic
difference of two elements.

Now, Tommy should be able to put these two together
to realize why
Conway doesn't contradict Cantor.

--- Christopher Heckman-
*****************************************************
Hmmmm...I'm afraid this is like hoping that a
childish, hyperactive
and whimsical brat will go to bed after he already
watched TV and ate
supper...hehe.
Good luck with that!
Regards
Tonio

you dont even know who conway is !

your just an *** insulting others.

i dont debate with stupid assholes.

you dont do math on this forum at all.

I don't know who this is directed at, but, if it's directed at me, you
should know that I attended Conway's lecture at Rutger's DIMACS
conference in 1998, and that I had supper with him at an Eithiopian
restaurant.

Conway invented the game of Life and had the first result about
whether a graph embedded in 3-dimensional space has a cycle which
traces out a non-trivial knot (namely that K7 has this property).
Conway is one of several people who I would "like to be".

Your move, Sherlock.

--- Christopher Heckman

.

Quantcast