Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:19:30 +0200
Virgil wrote:
In article <1184096471.659205.71380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The derivative of |x| is not
continuous but -1 for negative x and +1 for positive x. In contrast
sinx/x is continuous. Your example fails.
The expression sin(x)/x is not even defined for x = 0, so that WM is claiming that it has a value when it does not have a value.
Ah, My old friend the SINC-function:
http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/msg/c83b58832ecdff3f?hl=nl&
http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/msg/5f901fb48c959010?hl=nl&
http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/msg/00e4e198d9d92c40?hl=nl&
http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/msg/5cdf3ee484117124?hl=nl&
It IS defined for x = 0 and its value IS always 1 at x = 0 .
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- References:
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: WM
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- From: Virgil
- Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- Prev by Date: Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- Next by Date: Re: "Schild's Ladder" by Greg Egan
- Previous by thread: Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- Next by thread: Re: ** says: Definition: sum{i in N} i = 0
- Index(es):
Loading