Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory

On 14 Jul., 02:14, Virgil <vir...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Cantor himself was writing about base 2, using the symbols w and m.
But he did not clearly spell out that he meant real numbers.

Actually, Cantor clearly spelled out that his did NOT mean real numbers.

Quote please!

WM is only claiming that one particular rule does not work but cannot
show that there are no rules which work because there ARE rules which
work.

Give me any rule replacing one digit by another one.

Regards, WM

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: An uncountable countable set
    ... A quote please. ... Cantor: So while a changing quantity x that successively takes the ... potential infinite, on the other hand, a through the axioms completely ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor Confusion
    ... >>> I hoped to settle this question with my quote. ... > Meanwhile I checked your quotes and could not find any hint that Cantor ... > explicitly or implicitly stated that a set of cardinality aleph_0 has ... cardinality aleph_0 has an omega-th element, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: How or where should I look for help in speaking and writing japanese?
    ... >Maybe university will teach you how to quote? ... And spell and punctuate? ... (Or am I expecting too much?) ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
  • Re: Critical Path: Stone Age to Silicon Age in the fewest steps
    ... You misspelled my name and misunderstood the joke. ... This is a surprise? ... He still can't quote, or won't, in any comprehensible ... and he often can't spell ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • open and close quotation marks
    ... One feature I really miss is ... that WordPerfect could flag a missing close quote during the spell check. ...
    (microsoft.public.word.docmanagement)