Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory

On 14 Jul., 07:11, Virgil <vir...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

While I can see numerals (names of numbers) I have never seen a number.
While I have seen the names of sets, I have never seen a set itself.

But this evidence does not convince you that what you suspect to be
numbers and sets does not at all exist? You would never have been able
to think of those ghosts of numbers and sets without having seen the
due names. The collections of names and representations *are* the
numbers. The ghosts are imagined nonsense.

Regards, WM

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kratos
    ... don't think you would convince any jury that the only evidence they ... order to form a sufficiently robust belief that the suspect presents ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantors Theory
    ... But this evidence does not convince you that what you suspect to be ... only "exist" in the fictional world of mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: We have to respect the limits of human knowledge!
    ... has to remember that absence of data does not necessarilly equate ... And it will be important to consider *all* the evidence, ... There is as much evidence for witches as for ghosts. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Curious enough to know?
    ... Becuase of the preponderence of the evidence of their ... Is there really direct physical evidence that ghosts don't exist? ... In that at 'known' haunting sites every possible test has been ... question of the existence of God - and I would disagree with you.. ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BOY SCOUT STORY
    ... evidence for them. ... Science doesn't have any interest in these questions, ... thousands of claimed gods (Thor, Woden,Mithras, etc) and all the hundreds of claimed ... supernatural beings (ghosts, fairies, goblins, ...
    (rec.scouting.issues)
Loading