Re: set theory : the blunder
- From: tommy1729 <tommy1729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:10:20 EDT
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:26:30 EDT, tommy1729
<tommy1729@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
they are in a set.
(x,(y,z)) is NOT (x,y,z)
although (y,z) is y,z, this is no longer true if
Fascinating. How would they know (where they are)?
:-o
in the same way 2 knows it is smaller than 3 and the only even prime, therefore feeling little and humble , yet quite unique and special.
**rolleyes**
the architect
tommy1729
.
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
- References:
- Re: set theory : the blunder
- From: G . Frege
- Re: set theory : the blunder
- Prev by Date: Re: set theory : the blunder
- Next by Date: homomorphism from D6 to S5 or A5
- Previous by thread: Re: set theory : the blunder
- Next by thread: Re: set theory : the blunder
- Index(es):