Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:12:57 -0700
On 16 Jul., 07:20, Virgil <vir...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1184550638.931818.34...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Calvin <cri...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
After finally accepting everything else, I was still
having trouble with the notion that one couldn't use
'not having a largest element' to prove that a set is
infinite, if it is a subset of the naturals, integers,
rationals, or reals, all of which are one-dimensional
number systems.
IF one has a non-empty ordered set without a largest element, one can
easily prove
But IF one has an empty non-ordered set with a largest element, what
can one prove then? That question resembles on IF one has an infinite
set with a last element, like {1,2,3,..., omega} of order type omega +
1, is this set infinite?
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Subluxian
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Virgil
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Rotwang
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- References:
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Calvin
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Virgil
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: WM
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Virgil
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Albrecht
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: WM
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Calvin
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Rotwang
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Calvin
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Calvin
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Calvin
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Calvin
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- From: Virgil
- Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- Prev by Date: Re: Sir Isaac Newton, has originated, inter-conversion of mass and energy, (E=mc2 )
- Next by Date: Matrix-solution other than by Newton-Iteration?
- Previous by thread: Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- Next by thread: Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|