Re: Ultimate debunking of Cantor's Theory

In article <1184602377.255290.254310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 16 Jul., 07:20, Virgil <vir...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1184550638.931818.34...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

IF one has a non-empty ordered set without a largest element, one can
easily prove

But IF one has an empty non-ordered set with a largest element, what
can one prove then?

How can there be a "largest" if there is no ordering by which to compare
sizes?

Can Wm explain how to identify a largest without being able to compare
relative sizes?
.