... and twenty four months.
- From: fernando revilla <frej0002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:04:29 EDT
About the paper "Hyperbolic Classification of Natural
numbers and Goldbach Conjecture"
( See http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=5116035&tstart=0)
I express:
That in the two years in which the paper has been in
public knowledge, no technical and/or conceptual errors
have been found.
Keys:
1.- By means of a dynamical process we provide a
characterization of the GC in an infinite set of even
numbers that depends on time. This set is
S={a: (a even number) and (a>=16) and (a/2 non-prime)
and (a-3 non-prime)}
2.- This dynamical process is related to a convenient
identification of natural numbers with continuous
deformations of hyperbolas.
3.- In some sense, we are considering "bi dimensional
time" and this, has the advantage of avoiding prime
factorization ( "one dimensional time"). See J.J. Sylvester's
quote in:
http://secamlocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/zeta/NTandtime.htm
4.- As a consequence, any formal proof of the Goldbach
Conjecture in PA would imply the existence of a another
proof valid on an infinite set of bi parametrical structures
isomorphic to the usual one (N,+,*) except for one of them.
That is, there would be a proof of the GC not valid in
all temporal states associated to natural numbers.
Fernando.
P.S. This message is only placed in honour of the truth,
with no other motive.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ... and twenty four months.
- From: drmwecker
- Re: ... and twenty four months.
- From: galathaea
- Re: ... and twenty four months.
- From: G.E. Ivey
- Re: ... and twenty four months.
- From: Jon Slaughter
- Re: ... and twenty four months.
- Prev by Date: Re: Calculus 102
- Next by Date: Re: Geometric average: how to compute it: best approach ?
- Previous by thread: complex derivative question
- Next by thread: Re: ... and twenty four months.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
