Re: Internet, Goldbach conjecture, cranks and anticranks.


fernando revilla wrote:

------------------------------------------------------
---
Previous note:

I honestly believe that this message could be
useful not only for me, cranks and anti cranks
included.


------------------------------------------------------
---

1 ) On May 13, 2005 and in the topic Contradictory
nature of the Goldbach Conjecture, I gave a link (now
it is not valid)in sci.math, claiming that the GC was
contradictory.

2 ) On July 17, 2005 I submitted my paper to the
arXiv ( GM057347 ) .

3 ) On July 18,2005 I received acknowledgment from
a printed and well known refereed journal about the
submission of the mentioned paper.

4 ) On August 14, 2005 and reviewing my paper
exhaustively line by line, I found a flaw in the
penultimate page ( Proposition 3.1.7 ).

5 ) On April 2006 and after eight months of hard
work I solved that problem, and I communicated to the
journal the flaw. They asked me to sent the
corrections ( two pages were eliminated and six new
pages were added ).

6 ) On July 24 2006, i.e. after one year of
submission I received a letter from the journal with
a laconic "...the expert we consulted felt that the
paper is not suitable for this journal"

Now, my considerations:

a )The new title of the paper is " Hyperbolic
classification of natural numbers and Goldbach
conjecture" and you can find it in:

http://ficus.pntic.mec.es/~frej0002/conjetura.pdf


b ) As a consequence of the result 3.2.2 of my
revised paper we obtain the conclusion that the
existence of a proof for the Goldbach Conjecture in
Peano Arithmetic, would imply the existence of a
proof for the GC that would be valid "not in all
states of time " (i.e. it would depend on the way we
arrange natural numbers on the real line ).

c ) Taking into account that the new six pages
added do not spend a lot of time to review, I'll
consider on July 17, 2007 that the mathematical
community has accepted that the Goldbach Conjecture
is unprovable if I do not receive a communication of
f any fundamental error. ( Two years in Internet ).

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

hahahaha !!! well spoken !!!

tommy1729



Fernando Revilla.
Department, of Mathematics.
I.E.S. Sta Teresa de Jesús.
Comunidad de Madrid. Spain.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Continuing mystery?
    ... But what about Goldbach? ... Goldbach conjecture), written in a June 7, 1742 letter to Euler, ... integer greater than five is the sum of three primes". ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Fifteen months.
    ... SYRACUSE, CATALAN, GOLDBACH, TWIN PRIMES, etc... ... I am graduated with a PHD on the field of Applied Mathematics. ... GOLDBACH conjecture ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Possible approach to the Goldbach conjecture
    ... If you're interested in proving the Goldbach conjecture, ... "Short and direct proof of FLT published". ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A puzzle about the number 1
    ... > Actually it was Goldbach I was thinking of! ... > of stating the Goldbach Conjecture is: ... Yes, well, I think that this Goldbach-based answer has the drawback of ... is the sum of two primes", and I like my answer better. ...
    (rec.puzzles)