Re: Simple fact
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:19:31 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1184918446.539300.205200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<commentchecker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Guys
Say a and b are real numbers.
How do we show that the inverse additive of (a+b) is -b+-a
Start by NOT writing "+-a".
Write either -a-b, or else (-b) + (-a).
It'll be great if we can use group theory to do so.
You're the guy who thinks you will build up a child's confidence by
"slip[ping] in some group theory", right?
Shouldn't you at least understand the subject first? You are heading
straight into the disaster of New Math, with teachers trying to teach
what they don't understand.
As to your question:
The additive inverse of X is the UNIQUE element that, when added to X,
yields 0.
So, if you want to show that (-b)+(-a) is the additive inverse of
(a+b), then take (a+b), add (-b)+(-a) to it, and verify that you get
0.
After that how can we show that
inverse additive of countable sum of real numbers are the sum of each
of the inverse
So -(a1+a2+a3+...)=-a1-a2-a3...
How?
Induction.
And please, stay away from the kids and don't try to teach them any
group theory for now.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes" by Bill Watterson)
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin-at-member-ams-org
.
- References:
- Simple fact
- From: commentchecker
- Simple fact
- Prev by Date: Re: Group theory and axioms of real number
- Next by Date: Re: Oh, go find a "closed list" of reviewers to verify your masterpiece of math
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple fact
- Next by thread: Re: Simple fact
- Index(es):