Re: Quinn Tyler Jackson is president of the Mega-Bull*** Foundation

neilist <littoralee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Jul 20, 4:26 pm, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:<

<snip>

Now, maybe he said that somewhere else, but I sure don't recall it.

So when you just said in this very thread and very recently:

"I remember Jackson's contributions"

you were lying.

No, sir. I remember Jackson's contributions. I remember nothing like
you described. I searched to see if my memory was consistent with the
record. As far as I can tell, it is.

You have a funny notion of lying.

More than that, you were talking out of your ass. And since you
were speaking from memory, you have *** for brains. Ipso facto,
res ipsa loquitur, QED, voila, and ta da! Or even modus ponens
(right Fernando?).

Of course, maybe my memory is faulty.

No kidding.

Why not prove me wrong?

Because you allege to know the truth, but YOU CAN'T BACK IT UP!

Here's what I said.

I remember Jackson's contributions. I don't recall that he *ever*
claimed that JSH's paper must be correct.

I have not found any evidence that he said what you claim. Seems to
me that if you were telling the truth, you'd provide some proof.

Look at you! You talk from "memory", then backpedal very very
quickly. And you doubted your own memory by searching feebly, finding
nothing, and giving up. Tsk tsk.

No backpedaling. What I said was correct. I don't recall anything
like you report and I haven't seen any post to that effect during my
brief search.

You can't even admit (or remember?) that Quinny-whinny of the Mega-
Bull*** IQ Foundation used that intellectually dishonest "closed
list" excuse to protect his buddy James Harris. He's Quinn Liar
Jackson.

Wow. Very clever!

--
"This is based on the assumption that the difference in set size is what
makes the important difference between finite and infinite sets, but I think
most people -- even the mathematicians -- will agree that that probably
isn't the case." -- Allan C Cybulskie explains infinite sets
.