Re: TIMETRAVEL IS BULL*** SHUBEE
- From: Danny <fasttrack2a@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:19:04 EDT
Unless you would be in a different dimension not
being seen nor heard or being able to move any
object or change anything. You would be in a
time warp.
Look at particle physics, they don't understand
a lot of stuff about very small particles behaving
very strange.
So making a statement disproving something like this
is absurd.
Again I am not trying to prove or disprove time
travel but science is not far enough advanced
to make statements proving or disproving time
travel.
Dan
blah blah
thats your thinking ?
in other words you dont have a defense against my >paradox.
a parralel universe is not a solution since we were >talking about timetravel IN THIS DIMENSION.
btw the same arguments are true for paralel universes.
tommy1727 goes to parallel universe to collect mass and >energy and then returns to his own universe ...
same problems , conservation of mass and energy problem.
and now suppose someone's grandfather was not born in >the past , but in a parallel universe ...
then bye killing him he destroys 3 universes or what ???
(the universe of his child and grandchild )
tommy1729
If blah blah is your answer and you really understand
the rest of your stuff mentioned above like parallel universe
or multiple universes then I cannot argue
with an expert on the subject.
Thanks for the exchange of ideas, its
been a blast!
Dan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TIMETRAVEL IS BULL*** SHUBEE
- From: tommy1729
- Re: TIMETRAVEL IS BULL*** SHUBEE
- References:
- TIMETRAVEL IS BULL*** SHUBEE
- From: tommy1729
- TIMETRAVEL IS BULL*** SHUBEE
- Prev by Date: Re: representing polynomial range values as sums of 2 squares
- Next by Date: Re: Galois group A4
- Previous by thread: Re: TIMETRAVEL IS BULL*** SHUBEE
- Next by thread: Re: TIMETRAVEL IS BULL*** SHUBEE
- Index(es):