Re: Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- From: chasjac too <chazjac@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:16:01 +0000
Hero wrote:
(what I wrote before)
Now this is all embedded in the Euclidean plane...
My bad. To think of it the way you wish to, embed it in the real projective
plane. The points at infinity are then included in the ultra-ideal points.
In the Klein disk, you could have two lines that are segments of Euclidean
lines that are parallel.
Or the same expressed differently: In the Klein-disc two straight
lines are hyper-parallel, when these lines prolonged through the edge
of the disc interect outside in an ultra-ideal point.
sphere, followed by stereographic projection onto a plane. AlreadyFrom Klein to Poincare i have to do parallel projection onto half of a
with the first projection i'm stuck: whereto these ultra-ideal points
move?
While convenient, I think there might be a better way to transform the Klein
disk into the Poincare disk that carries the whole plane along -- that's
your problem in the first projection. I know I've read this somewhere,
maybe in Coxeter? Let me see what I can find.
--charlie
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- From: Hero
- Re: Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- References:
- Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- From: Hero
- Re: Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- From: chasjac too
- Re: Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- From: Hero
- Re: Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- From: chasjac too
- Re: Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- From: Hero
- Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- Prev by Date: Re: LOG(M) <= f(M) <= (LOG(M))^2/2
- Next by Date: Re: Simple Analytic Geometry Question
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it permitted in math to go beyond?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|