Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- From: "Stephen J. Herschkorn" <sjherschko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:27:38 -0400
Daryl McCullough wrote:
Stephen J. Herschkorn says...
Do you consider the prood of Cantor-Shroeder-Bernstein to be constructive? If so, Kunen shows how to build an injection from k x k to k when k is an infinite cardinal
That's the part that I was wondering about. What is the injection
from k x k -> k?
Of course, I know of such injections for the case
k = omega and k = 2^omega, but those don't obviously
generalize to other cardinals.
Ok, here it is, from p. 29 of Kunen: By definition, a cardinal is an ordinal. We define a relation R on k x k:
((a,b), (c,d)) in R iff
[maj(a,b) < maj(c,d)] or [maj(a,b) = maj(c,d) and (a,b) precedes (c,d) lexicographically]
Show by induction that R is a well-ordering of type no greater than k.
--
Stephen J. Herschkorn sjherschko@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Math Tutor on the Internet and in Central New Jersey and Manhattan
.
- References:
- Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- From: theronruiz
- Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- Prev by Date: Pseudo Pythagorean Triples (^p)
- Next by Date: Re: Inducing Inner Automorphisms
- Previous by thread: Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- Next by thread: Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- Index(es):