Re: Weird but fascinating

From: guyontheinet@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:32:43 -0700

On Jul 31, 12:14 am, "biggus" <dd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"JSH" <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1185846483.648757.230430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Whew! Quite a bit of work from yesterday to today when I finally
realized I was brainstorming out a proof that I now call the wrapper
theorem. Turns out that the key to all that freaking arguing over the
years was noting that if you have a polynomial with integer
coefficients in an integral domain

what is an integral domain ?

A commutative ring R with identity 1_R <> 0_R, that has no zero
divisors.

.

References:
- JSH: Weird but fascinating
  - From: JSH
- Re: Weird but fascinating
  - From: biggus

Prev by Date: Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
Next by Date: Re: SMOOTH URYSOHN'S LEMMA
Previous by thread: Re: Weird but fascinating
Next by thread: Re: JSH: Weird but fascinating
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: JSH: Weird but fascinating
... realized I was brainstorming out a proof that I now call the wrapper ... Turns out that the key to all that freaking arguing over the ... coefficients in an integral domain then the factorization ...
(sci.math)
Re: Weird but fascinating
... realized I was brainstorming out a proof that I now call the wrapper ... Turns out that the key to all that freaking arguing over the ... coefficients in an integral domain ...
(sci.math)