Punctuation

How would you punctuate this?

Ae>0Ed>0P(x,e,d)

"For all epsilon greater than zero, there exists a delta greater than
zero such that proposition."

Would the proper punctuation be the insertion of colons:

Ae>0:Ed>0:P(x,e,d)

Would it be grouping the quantifiers:

(Ae>0)(Ed>0)P(x,e,d)

Is there a recommended/preferred approach?

--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
This message contains at least 95% recycled bytes.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Possible proof of Gabriels Theorem?
    ... >> that delta must eventually become zero, however, according to the ... No infinitesimals. ... Nothing indeed about epsilon being small. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: "All random number generators eventually exhibit periodicity"?????
    ... >my mind) the strongest indication, where its strength is epsilon, ... >such that for any number delta greater than zero, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Punctuation
    ... zero such that proposition." ... Michael F. Stemper ... delta greater than zero such that P" could be written: ... No, this seems to read "If all epsilon are positive, then ..." ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Punctuation
    ... Michael Stemper wrote: ... zero such that proposition." ... Then, "For all epsilon greater than zero, there exists a ... delta greater than zero such that P" could be written: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Forth PARANOIA
    ... to floating point is that (0+delta)^0=1 for all delta, ... Since from delta approaching zero from both the negative ... I'm not a mathematician so I leave it to the experts to prove or ... rather than a 1 which could result from a valid computation. ...
    (comp.lang.forth)