Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 05:03:56 -0500
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:52:58 -0400, "Stephen J. Herschkorn"
<sjherschko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Herman Jurjus wrote:
Herman Rubin wrote:
[snip]
It is trivial to order the power set of a well-ordered set
Would you care to explain what you have in mind, here?
I am pretty sure that Herman R. refers to the following: Given a
well-ordered set X, order F = 2^X as follows. For f, g in F, let
x be least such that f(x) != g(x). Then f < g iff f(x) < g(x).
Without referring to 2^X, this becomes: Let A and B be subsets of
X. A < B iff and A contains the smallest element in the symmetric
difference of A and B. Exercise: Show this is a well-ordering of
P(X) without reference to 2^X.
Did you work out a solution to this "exercise" before posting it?
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- Prev by Date: Re: Garden of Eden positions in Life: Was: Re: game of life question
- Next by Date: Re: primes
- Previous by thread: Re: Punctuation
- Next by thread: Re: Constructibility of X -> X^2 bijection
- Index(es):