Re: JSH: Now the fun part
- From: fishfry <BLOCKSPAMfishfry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:29:24 -0700
In article <1186374261.051963.81310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Assume I'm correct in that from the ring of objects you can prove that
units are being used in the ring of algebraic integers where they are
not units to wrap up constants like 7 so that you can divide them off
and remain in that ring.
Units are being used where they are not units? What the hell does that
mean? Are they units or not? Do you know that the sentence you wrote
above doesn't make any sense?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: Now the fun part
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: Now the fun part
- References:
- JSH: Now the fun part
- From: JSH
- JSH: Now the fun part
- Prev by Date: Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- Next by Date: singular perturbation of the linearized poisson boltzmann equation for the static electric potential field
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: Now the fun part
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Now the fun part
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|