Re: Another Inconvenient Truth

David C. Ullrich wrote:

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:49:48 +0200, Han de Bruijn
<Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Mike Kelly wrote:

Because it is _useful_. That is indeed an inconvenient truth for
cranks.

Wrong. Cantor's theory is useless on too many occasions.

Huh? Of course it's useless on many occasions!

Your automobile is useless on many occaisions as well. Does
that imply that it's not useful?

I mean, duh.

Duh. But it's worse. Cantor's theory gives _wrong_ results on too many
occasions. But ah, you won't call it "wrong", just "counter-intuitive".

Han de Bruijn

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
    ... Cantor's theory is useless on too many occasions. ... Your automobile is useless on many occaisions as well. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
    ... Cantor's theory is useless on too many occasions. ... Your automobile is useless on many occaisions as well. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
    ... Cantor's theory is useless on too many occasions. ... Huh? ... Your automobile is useless on many occaisions as well. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: The Heresy of Scientists
    ... As I've demonstrated on many occasions, the ToE is completely, ... > utterly and definitely *useless*. ... Your inability to respond to my refutation of that ridiculous claim in ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
    ... Cantor's theory is useless on too many occasions. ... What scientific standards? ... And how did set theory disagree with these ...
    (sci.math)