Re: Trig Fomula
- From: Robert Israel <israel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:29:47 -0500
Deep <deepkdeb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Any comment and reference about the correctness of the following
assertion will be appreciated.
Assertion: If (1) is valid then (2) is also valid under the given
conditions.
Tan kD = (u/v)^(1/2) (1)
Tan D = (m/n)^(1/2) (2)
Conditions: 0 < D < pi/2; u, v, m, n are integers each > 1 and none is
a pefect square; (u, v) = 1, (m, n) = 1.
Prime k > 3.
Why don't you try a few small examples before making such assertions?
--
Robert Israel israel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trig Fomula
- From: quasi
- Re: Trig Fomula
- References:
- Trig Fomula
- From: Deep
- Trig Fomula
- Prev by Date: How to Implemented HMM in Intrusion Detection System?
- Next by Date: Re: Sets counting
- Previous by thread: Trig Fomula
- Next by thread: Re: Trig Fomula
- Index(es):