Re: Trig Fomula
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:45:55 -0400
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:29:47 -0500, Robert Israel
<israel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Deep <deepkdeb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Any comment and reference about the correctness of the following
assertion will be appreciated.
Assertion: If (1) is valid then (2) is also valid under the given
conditions.
Tan kD = (u/v)^(1/2) (1)
Tan D = (m/n)^(1/2) (2)
Conditions: 0 < D < pi/2; u, v, m, n are integers each > 1 and none is
a pefect square; (u, v) = 1, (m, n) = 1.
Prime k > 3.
Why don't you try a few small examples before making such assertions?
I second this complaint.
However, based on many similar prior posts, I think that Deep probably
lacks the skills and technology to test such conjectures.
In any case, here's a simple counterexample ...
Let u=3,v=2, and let D be the smallest positive real number such that
tan(5D)=sqrt((3/2)). Thus, (1) is satisfied.
It's straightforward to show that tan^2(D) is a root of the equation
2*x^5-115*x^4+520*x^3-530*x^2+110*x-3 = 0
but by the rational root test, the above equation has no rational
roots. Thus (2) fails.
quasi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trig Fomula
- From: Deep
- Re: Trig Fomula
- References:
- Trig Fomula
- From: Deep
- Re: Trig Fomula
- From: Robert Israel
- Trig Fomula
- Prev by Date: 'Probability Theory: The Logic of Science' for $3.95 on Amazon.ca
- Next by Date: Re: Please give link for basic differentiation tutorial.
- Previous by thread: Re: Trig Fomula
- Next by thread: Re: Trig Fomula
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading